Find out now if you qualify. Time is limited to file a claim. You may be entitled to compensation. Fill out the form below to see if you qualify.

Attorney Advertising. Information submitted will be transmitted to a law firm. This communication is intended to be an attorney-client communication for purposes of evaluating your claim and will be kept confidential by the law firm. The communication does not create an attorney-client relationship and no relationship is formed until a fee agreement is signed by you and the law firm. I also have read and agree to your Privacy Policy

Contact Us Now

April 2022: The MDL Paraquat class action judge will have a status conference on April 1st to review where the litigation is headed and how best to take the bellwether lawsuits forward for trial in November 2022. 44 new paraquat lawsuits have been added to the MDL in the last two weeks. At this pace, April 2022 will be the busiest month for new files yet. Last week, the parties filed their class-action bellwether picks with the Paraquat MDL judge. Those choices, however, have not been made public.

May 2022: In the last month, over 50 new cases have been added to the Paraquat Lawsuit Multidistrict Litigation (MDL). A group of six patients was recently selected by the Paraquat MDL court for the initial Paraquat Parkinson's disease bellwether trials. As a result, the first trial in November 2022 is approaching soon. The strategy is to select 16 paraquat claims from among the almost 1000 Parkinson's disease litigation claims filed. Following some limited fact discovery in these instances, paraquat attorneys on both sides submitted a preference list to the MDL court, ranking the 16 cases in order of priority. Attorneys for plaintiffs seek the finest facts for their clients, while defense attorneys want the worst. The judge whittled the list down to six Paraquat claims based on these rankings.

CLAIM UPDATES 

Our experienced team is dedicated to helping you secure the justice & compensation you deserve. Fill out the form above for a Free Claim Review.

Significant compensation may be available. Free Claim Review.

We actively engaged in monitoring the latest legal updates surrounding Ethylene Oxide lawsuits, assisting victims nationwide in pursuing claims against responsible entities. Their team of Ethylene Oxide exposure attorneys is available to address any questions regarding legal rights and options for individuals and families affected by harmful EtO emissions. Significant compensation may be available to those who act now. Contact us today for a Free Claim Review by filling out the form above. 

Seek Justice Today

Maryland Juvenile Detention 

Abuse Claim Help

EPA: "Cancer risk of these commercial sterilizers was more than 100 additional cancer cases per million people exposed"

Alfred D. Noyes Children's Center  
Backbone Mountain Youth Center
Baltimore City Juvenile Justice Center
Charles H. Hickey, Jr. School &
Structured Shelter Care Program
Cheltenham Youth Detention Center
Garrett Children's Center 

If you started using sports betting or casino-style apps as a minor or between ages 18 and 25, and promotions like “free bets,” “bonus bets,” “risk-free” offers, or constant push notifications helped pull you in, you’re not alone. Many college students say these apps felt less like entertainment and more like an always-on system designed to keep you betting—especially when money was tight, stress was high, and “one more bet” felt like the fastest way to fix a loss.

for California's juvenile detention facilities

Sterilization Facilities Linked to Cancer

Puerto Rico:
Villalba - Medtronic
Juncos - Medtronic
Dorado - Guidant Puerto Rico/DBA Boston Scientific
Arecibo - St. Jude Medical
Fajardo - Customed
Salinas - Steri-Tech
Añasco - Edwards Lifesciences Technology

In an August 2022 report, the EPA revealed that the cancer risk at 23 of these commercial sterilizer facilities was in excess of 100 additional cancer cases per million people exposed, according to its most recent risk assessment.

If you or a loved one live, or have lived near one of these facilities and has developed cancer, please fill out the form above for a Free Claim Review. Seek the justice & compensation you deserve.

Sterilization Facilities Linked to Cancer

Legal Help for Gambling Loses

Protect Your Health & Rights

Ethylene Oxide (EtO) is a colorless, flammable gas commonly used in the sterilization of medical equipment and other commercial products. Despite its critical role in preventing infections, ethylene oxide has been classified as a human carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Prolonged exposure to EtO has been linked to serious health issues, including various forms of cancer, reproductive disorders, and respiratory complications. Communities living near sterilizing facilities and workers in these environments face significant health risks from chronic exposure.

Due to the mounting evidence of its harmful effects, a growing number of lawsuits have been filed against companies using ethylene oxide in their sterilization processes. These lawsuits allege that corporations failed to properly warn employees, nearby residents, and regulatory agencies about the dangerous levels of EtO emissions. Victims include workers directly exposed to EtO in sterilizing facilities, as well as community members suffering from environmental exposure.

Recent settlements in ethylene oxide lawsuits have ranged widely, from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. For instance, individual settlements for workers and residents exposed to high levels of EtO have surpassed $1 million in some cases. These settlements reflect the serious long-term health consequences of exposure and serve as a deterrent for corporations neglecting safety standards.

How We Can Help

We’re specifically looking to help college students and young adults who began using sports betting or gambling apps as a minor or between the ages of 18 and 25. We review cases involving major sportsbook and gambling platforms such as DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, bet365, and others, and if you used a different platform, you can select “Other”—we still want to review it. Losses and overall impact matter as well, so we’ll ask about your estimated total losses (or total deposits if that’s easier), how quickly your betting increased over time, and whether promotions like free bets or bonus bets kept you betting longer or placing bigger wagers than you planned. We’ll also discuss the real-world consequences you experienced, including credit card debt, loans, overdrafts, missed rent or tuition, borrowing money from friends or family, and any academic or personal fallout such as missed classes, anxiety, depression, sleep problems, or relationship strain. Finally, we’ll ask whether you obtained any mental health counseling related to gambling or its effects—such as therapy, psychiatric care, medication changes, treatment programs, or support groups—because this can help document harm, but you do not need counseling history to request a confidential review. 

They make betting feel normal and low-risk by flooding new users with incentives like free bets and bonus bets that require extra wagering to “unlock,” “risk-free” or “no sweat” promos that still put your money at risk, deposit-match offers that nudge you into putting down more than you planned, and loss-chasing hooks such as “get a bonus if your bet loses.” Many students also report VIP programs or personal “hosts” who encourage continued betting, along with push notifications timed around big games, rivalry weekends, and major sports events. For a lot of students, it starts as a harmless promo and quickly turns into a cycle of chasing losses. If those promotions or other platform practices contributed to serious harm, you may have legal options depending on your state and the specific facts.

Legal Help for Gambling Loses

A potential claim may focus on whether a sportsbook or gambling company used deceptive or unfair marketing tactics or product design features that fueled addiction and major losses—especially for younger users (minors and ages 18–23) who may be more vulnerable to impulsive decisions and peer pressure. In a confidential review, we can look at issues such as offers marketed as “free” that had hidden conditions or misleading framing, unclear bonus terms like rollover/playthrough requirements or minimum-odds restrictions, repeated incentives that encouraged continued betting after losses, targeted student-facing advertising (including social media, influencer-style ads, or campus-area targeting), “responsible gaming” tools that felt ineffective or weren’t meaningfully enforced, and aggressive re-engagement through texts, emails, push alerts, VIP outreach, or other prompts to keep betting. Every case is different and no outcome can be guaranteed, but a confidential review can help determine whether your situation fits a viable claim.